According to Aldous Huxley, his novel Brave New World was meant to be a satire. As satires go, they often try to point out social or personal weaknesses by poking fun of them in some exaggerated sort of way. For Huxley, he was obviously trying to point to systems that were attempting to make people more uniform, to not think for themselves, etc. In doing that, he created a society that seems absurd to us.Tess was also a book that critiqued society, in the ways they judged others, including women. Obviously though, Tess of the D'Urbervilles is NOT a satire, but was a tragedy. Rather than poking fun of Tess's life, Thomas Hardy allowed us to see what Tess felt and thought.
Here is what I'd like you to consider and discuss here:
- How are these two types of social criticism different, and what effect do you think they have on people? In other words, what do you suppose is the difference in the reaction to both pieces?
- Which technique do you find most interesting, or that speaks to you? (It could be both, but for different reasons.)
- Share one exaggerated moment from Brave New World that most stood out to you as a satire (funny).
Good luck!

